Vitamin K is Optional, Just Not Presented That Way

Like everything else that happens in birth and after your baby is born, EVERYTHING, is your choice.  Not many things are presented as choices but you are the primary caregiver for this child and you are the primary decision maker.

It is your job to evaluate the recommendations, ask questions, do your research, and come up with the decision that is right for you.  Rarely do decision need to be made on the spot.  Say thank you for the information, we will think about it and get back to you.  Since you are the one who has to live with the outcome of your decision, you need to be comfortable with it.

The Canadian Pediatric Society recommends intramuscular injection of vitamin K for all newborn infants.  The UK Department of Health also recommend it, as does the American Academy of PediatricsYou need to make a choice for yourself. 

Vitamin K started being given to babies routinely when we started circumcising boys soon after birth.  It is easier for hospitals to give it to all babies as routine than to think about which ones would actually need it.  Now it is recommended because of risk of hemorrhage but in reality that is not a great risk for all babies.  

I do not agree with doing medical interventions, with potential harmful affects, on everyone for the few that actually need it.  It puts your baby at risk, when their risk before the procedure may have been minimal. Risk and benefit is up to the individual to decide.

The long term risk to vitamin K injection are not known.  No one has done prospective studies on what happens to these babies 50 years down the road.  My personal slant is to be as conservative as possible.  To me, that means do nothing to the body that does not have a clear specific benefit that outweighs any potential or unknown risk.  For me, if its life or death, choose life.  If its just because, I trust the body not man made interventions with unknown risk.  The human body has been around for hundreds of thousands of years, vitamin K about 50 years.  Again, benefit and risk is up to the individual and you need to make a choice for yourself.

Doing procedures as routine also allows our health care providers to be lazy and not to actually need to be capable of assessing and diagnosing a real situation when its needed.  That leads to losing skills.

Another example is  giving all women a shot of pitocin after birth instead of assessing if it is actually necessary.  Or like doing cesareans for breech, when in reality, most can be birthed vaginally.  You put a lot of women and babies at risk when you do an unnecessary cesarean and you lose the skills to effectively deal with a breech delivery and how to assess who actually needs a c-scetion.

My personal philosophy is that if we really needed to have that level of vitamin K at birth we would be born with it.  We are not born ill equipped to deal with life.  Breastfeeding gives babe some vitamin K and vaginal birth helps to colonize the gut with the bacteria that produce vitamin K.  Demand delayed cord clamping so your baby has its full blood supply.

To make a fully informed decision you need to be fully informed.  Read the statements from the CPS, UKDoH, and AAP (all linked above), read this by Dr. Mercola and watch the video by a PhD expert in vitamin K , read this great post about it, also read the info provided by the manufacturer see below.

You can also look at alternatives like the oral version of vitamin K or seeing a naturopath for a herbal version.

Once you are fully informed, the choice you make will be the right one for you and your family.

Here is some information to consider when making your decision, from Merck.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33874512/Merck-Vitamin-K-Package-Insert-Aquamephyton-PI Ingredients and side effects listed from Merck’s version of vitamin K.

“Severe reactions including fatalities have occurred during and immediately after parenteral administration.”

“Benzyl alcohol as a preservative in Bacteriostatic Sodium Chloride Injection has been associated with toxicity in newborns. Data are unavailable on the toxicity of other preservatives in this age group.” [Dr. Nancy note: Why are we using something on newborns that is known to be toxic for newborns?]

“Pregnancy Category C:
Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with AquaMEPHYTON. It is also not known whether AquaMEPHYTON can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. AquaMEPHYTON should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.”
[Dr. Nancy note:  If it is not considered unknown safety for a pregnant women because of potential effects on her baby and only if "clearly needed" why are we giving it to babies without it being "clearly needed?"]
“Nursing Mothers
It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when AquaMEPHYTON is administered to a nursing woman.”
[Dr. Nancy note:  If it is not considered safe for a nursing child to get it through breastmilk, why would you give it directly if it is not medically indicated?]
“Pediatric Use
Hemolysis, jaundice, and hyperbilirubinemia in newborns, particularly in premature infants,may be related to the dose of AquaMEPHYTON. Therefore, the recommended dose should not be exceeded.”
[Dr. Nancy note:  Are we causing jaundice and the need for babies to be hospitalized, separated from mom, or have breastfeeding sabotaged by misinformation about breastfeeding and jaundice?]
“ADVERSE REACTIONS
Severe hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactoid reactions and deaths have beenreported following parenteral administration. The majority of these reported events occurredfollowing intravenous administration (see Box Warning.)The possibility of allergic sensitivity, including an anaphylactoid reaction, should be kept inmind following parenteral administration.Transient “flushing sensations” and “peculiar” sensations of taste have been observed, as well as rare instances of dizziness, rapid and weak pulse, profuse sweating, brief hypotension, dyspnea, and cyanosis.Pain, swelling, and tenderness at the injection site may occur.Infrequently, usually after repeated injection, erythematous, indurated, pruritic plaques have occurred; rarely, these have progressed to scleroderma-like lesions that have persisted for longperiods. In other cases, these lesions have resembled erythema perstans. Hyperbilirubinemia [jaundice] has been observed in the newborn following administration of phytonadione. This has occurred rarely and primarily with doses above those recommended.”
“Treatment of Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn
Empiric administration of vitamin should not replace proper laboratory evaluation of the coagulation mechanism.  A prompt response (shortening of the prothrombin time in 2 to 4 hours)following administration of vitamin K is usually diagnostic of hemorrhagic disease of the newborn, and failure to respond indicates another diagnosis or coagulation disorder. AquaMEPHYTON 1 mg should be given either subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Higher doses may be necessary if the mother has been receiving oral anticoagulants.”
What did you choose for your baby?  Leave your comments below.

About Dr. Nancy

Dr. Nancy has been practicing family, wellness chiropractic since 2001. Her focus in practice is prenatal and pediatric chiropractic and caring for the whole family. She is also a childbirth educator and has coached numerous women through their pregnancies, births, and in caring for their young children.
This entry was posted in Breastfeeding, Informed Choice, Natural Living, Newborn Procedures and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>